Yes, the saying is in sheep’s clothing, but Dave Congalton does nothing to hide his liberal slant any more. He used to be a liberal in sheep’s clothing, prior to the end of liberal radio on the Central Coast. He had to keep it toned down to be set aside from that format. He had to establish himself as being different to keep from losing listeners. Since they have stepped away from “Air America,” he has picked up the liberal baton on a station that has primarily conservative listeners.
Dave claims to be an award winning author (he wrote a book in 2000, and another in 2002, both about pets), but here is the truth about that statement. His first book, “Three Cats, Two Dogs, One Journey Through Multiple Pet Loss,” won the 2001 Merial Human-Animal Bond Award for Best Writing from the Dog Writers Association of America. I am sure I could write a book and find some organization that wants to back my efforts to issue an award for my writing. It is not a Pulitzer, Dave. It is an activist group that has only given out awards to authors writing about animals and pets. That is not a general acceptance of your work. In fact, this person really takes exception to Dave’s attitudes.
He also claims to be a screenwriter now. His previous attempt failed miserably when partners failed to find interest and financing in the project. In the meantime, Scribble has managed to find a list of little known and secondary principles to jump on the bandwagon, including Dave’s Wife, Charlotte Alexander (hiding her name as C.L. Alexander). It seems many people involved with Dave Congalton hide their names, as you will see later in this Blog. I can “hear” Dave’s comment, “Can you do better? At least I have accomplished this,” but there are so many others that have accomplished more but do not feel the need to pound their chest over it. How do you know I have not written a script? If I post my info here, people might find out who I am. In any case, Dave, you think of yourself as a big fish, but it is a very small pond with several leaches trying to follow you around.
I do not dislike Dave. In fact, we have had positive encounters in the past and perhaps in the future, and he seems like a nice guy. I have simply decided to cast some light on his actions, just as I would with anyone that was doing something I felt was deceitful or wrong. Yes, I believe Dave Congalton is being deceitful with all of us.
Dave Congalton hails from Chicago, which we all know is not a conservative place to live and practice politics. He had been a college instructor, trying to get into Cal Poly to teach Speech Communication (a bastion for liberal media). Even his wife was a liberal instructor, teaching public relations and broadcast writing, and now specializing in marketing. Marketing? So I guess it really is the woman who has made the man? She has probably helped Dave with connections and marketing techniques to keep his head above water.
Dave Congalton has been on the radio since January, 1992. In the beginning, he came on as a weak voice in a sea of many other interview shows. His show sounded pretty passive, and almost put listeners to sleep. Even Congalton himself has commented that his old show was a sleep-inducer. He then tried to liven things up, taking on topics that listeners wanted to cover. He would take a typical news story and ask people to express opinion on the subject. Sometimes it made for an interesting format, but I remember often finding Dave to be a bit naive and uninformed about some topics covered.
In fact, if you listen to his show today, you will find that many times Dave only has the information his guests have provided him. Dave is just putting a show together and is happy to have guests. He does not do his homework to find out more information to hold people responsible for their comments. He rides along with them, and when someone calls in to tell Dave he is on the wrong side of the argument, Dave shuts them up and gives plenty of follow up time to the guest to discredit the caller. This is especially true with his liberal guests that cannot carry on an argument based on facts.
There were other shows that were stronger in their voice and format, and better informed, but they have since retired or made way to automation and other programming. Dave has held on by the “skin of his teeth” by producing income from sponsors. He has had to do segments with his sponsors to produce 30 to 60 minute commercials for them. He would often have a sponsor on under the guise of discussing a topic for the audience, only to continue talking about the business itself and hawking it. He also has his sponsors come on to pretend to be a specialist on a topic. Marketing tips from his wife, Charlotte Alexander? We need listener pressure and people realizing they are listening to informercials.
It has been stated that his radio talk show is top rated in our area for the weekday time slot for his broadcast, but what are the choices? You have sports or Congalton. What is your choice? What about the former liberal Air America station? They have played with their time slots, and since most of the population of Dave’s broadcast area are conservative, they will only listen to one station. It does not matter what they broadcast in that time slot, as long as it is not openly liberal. However, that is the direction Dave Congalton is heading. This means his listenership will subside, and it will be hard pressed for management to keep him in such a prime time slot.
Right now they are looking for the local revenues. As long as Dave pushes to get sponsors, KVEC will not change things. If it is making money, it will stay. However, with Dave slanting liberal more and more, I am sure many listeners will turn away from Congalton’s show and his ad rates will have to drop. I am sure sponsors will drop his show, as well. Once revenue is low enough, management at KVEC will put an end to this liberal’s show and replace him with something that will make money, like perhaps Dr. Laura.
What evidence is there that Dave Congalton is not conservative when he is on a station running conservative shows such as Rush Limbaugh? In an interview by Ken Kenyon in the winter of 2008, Dave Congalton was asked whether he would consider doing a nationally sydicated show. Dave Congalton answered, “The short answer is no. Nationally syndicated radio favors those who lean right politically: conservative talk radio. I don’t have that political leaning.” Therefore, we hear straight from Dave Congalton himself that he is NOT conservative. That leaves two other positions: Liberal and Centrist. Is Dave Congalton a centrist?
Every time he gets a liberal chiming in on the phones to approve of his comments, he feels empowered and bold. He has regular callers that rotate. If you listen carefully and write down the names of callers, you will see that fewer than a dozen liberals can dominate his show. He constantly berates Matt Kokkonen when he calls in or is a guest on Dave’s show (not nearly as often as any of Dave’s liberal friends). He sometimes has Annie Lorenzen or Conservative Bob, but when they are talking about politics, he puts them down and does what he can to discredit their statements.
Dave’s favorite guests include such liberal voices as Santa Maria Bill (who refuses to identify himself yet has hosted Dave’s show several times), Michele D (he no longer uses her last name and allows here to make outrageous claims and statements without accountability and verification), and staff from uncoveredslo and Cal Coast News to bash government and conservatives. This seems counter to the liberal viewpoint, but when he is bashing government, it usually has to do with being on the wrong side of a liberal issue.
I am writing in broad sweeping terms, but if you compare the number of liberal and conservative topics and which side Dave Congalton is on, you will see that I am correct with a majority of instances. I welcome any factual response and counter to this point. Of course, there is no factual counter to my point so I expect a lot of baseless emotional comments to answer.
What about Dave picking up the torch for Dan DeVaul? Concern over DeVaul was only for the people on the ranch, not Dan’s rights or property owner’s rights. In fact, in a two hour segment, he did not address Mr. DeVaul’s right to do what he wants with the property. Not once did he tell the county to let Dan exercise property rights. He only urged the county to provide for the residents of the ranch. Dave Congalton does not care about Dan DeVaul or his rights. Dave only cares about the liberal agenda presented.
There is certainly a different style in interviewing liberal candidates over conservative. He disguises it well, but during election time, write down the questions he asks candidates each day, then go back and look at them in comparison when it is all done. Surprise! Kid gloves and a chance to explain things for the liberals, and all defensive for conservatives. You can find this by visiting his podcasts and comparing from the last election week. Let me know what you come up with.
Dave Congalton supports Mothers for Peace, and has even spoken at dinner for “Save the Mesa,” another liberal environmental group. He supports teachers views over parents and Christians as noted in this blog post regardless of their improper acts, and every chance he gets to poke someone and keep the pot stirred to distract people from the real issues of the day. He even put down “birthers” that question whether President Obama was born in Hawaii, tricking a conservative to come on to his show to lend fake credibility to his topic. He will stoop to any level just to fool you and try to manipulate you.
KVEC is pushing Dave Congalton’s Blog to keep advertising and exposure up. Perhaps a device pushed by Dave’s marketing specialist wife. If you visit his Blog and read enough, you will witness his liberal slant for yourself. I do not think management from the station or El Dorado Broadcasters has read his entries. Dave Congalton acts as if he is God and arbiter, put on this planet to tell you what to think and what is right. He may argue that he wants to stimulate thought, but so do other liberals. They want to stimulate thought and bring you to their point of view.
Of course, these links to his blog and podcasts will help his traffic a bit, but it will also show management that people are reading this and moving on to learn for themselves how liberal Dave Congalton is. They will see that you have pierced the veil of centrist dribble to get to the meat and facts of this liberal in wolf’s clothing. Perhaps I should keep it a liberal in sheep’s clothing, as he tries to pull the wool over our eyes.
I am not a conservative, nor am I a Christian. I respect all people and all opinions, but declare mine to be the most sane and unbiased you will find out here. I do not tell you what to think and how to think it. I present facts and opinion openly and clearly. I tell you what I believe, and you can usually tell when I am stating what I think. Dave Congalton has a social responsibility to present an open forum for all opinions, not just those he wants to promote. By calling his show “Hometown Radio,” he raises it up to a higher standard. This produces a responsibility to incorporate the opinions and needs of the hometown, and to allow all people to express their opinion without bias. Dave, if you want your show to express only your opinions, then present that disclaimer or stop calling it “Hometown Radio”. You drag Mardi Hall down with you when you do that.
Dave’s comments will probably include statements like, “I don’t lend credibility to any statements made by someone who does not identify him/herself.” However, Dave, you do so with your liberal friends, and even allow your wife to hide her name. How about anticipating Dave’s challenge to face off with him or allow him to present his side? Dave, you can post comments here like anyone else. I will gladly respond in the comments section, and invite all others to jump in. I will be factual and straight with Dave, and irreverent with everyone else. I tell you this because I know the liberals will come out in force over this. They don’t want to lose their rampart.
How about a BUNCH of Liberals in Wolf’s Clothing? I guess that’s better than them being naked. I don’t think anyone could handle their naked truths. They would come out a bit on the short end.
The Opinionator